“He’s better than Palmer currently” “Why subbing him” – Joe Cole slams Enzo Maresca for subbing Chelsea star instead of Cole Palmer
The Blues resounding victory against Southampton should have been a celebration of dominance and attacking brilliance. However, a managerial decision by Enzo Maresca has stirred controversy, with club legend Joe Cole openly questioning why a key player Pedro Neto was substituted instead of Cole Palmer.
A Tactical Head-Scratcher
Despite Chelsea’s emphatic win, Cole voiced his displeasure over what he saw as an unjustified substitution. The former Chelsea star did not hold back in his post-match analysis, criticizing Maresca’s handling of a player he believed was outperforming Palmer on the day.
“Why is Enzo Maresca subbing Pedro Neto out instead of Palmer? He was definitely better than Palmer during the match. He would have scored more goals if the manager would just allow him to,” Cole said.
The comments have reignited the debate over favoritism in the squad, with many fans echoing Cole’s concerns.
A Performance Worthy of More Minutes.
The player in question was instrumental in Chelsea’s attacking play, consistently creating chances, linking up well with teammates, and showing a hunger for goals. With a high work rate and direct attacking play, he seemed to be on course for an even more significant impact before Maresca made the unexpected substitution.
Palmer, while undoubtedly one of Chelsea’s brightest talents, had a less influential display in comparison. This contrast in performance made Maresca’s decision all the more puzzling to Cole and other observers.
Favoritism or Tactical Strategy?
Maresca’s decision could stem from multiple factors—tactical adjustments, player fatigue, or a preference for Palmer’s technical ability in maintaining control of the game. However, for Joe Cole, the move appeared to signal favoritism rather than a logical tactical switch.
“You need to reward performances. When a player is shining, you let them thrive, not take them off,” Cole insisted.
Some fans share his sentiment, believing that Maresca is overly reliant on Palmer, possibly to the detriment of other deserving players.
Chelsea Fans Reactions and Social Media Buzz
Chelsea supporters took to social media in droves to discuss the substitution, with many siding with Joe Cole’s assessment.
“Joe Cole is absolutely right! The lad was running the show, and yet Maresca pulls him off. Makes no sense,”one fan tweeted.
Another added, “Palmer is great, but he wasn’t at his best today. The manager needs to be fair with his decisions.”
Others, however, defended Maresca, arguing that Palmer’s influence on the game extends beyond goals and assists, and his retention on the pitch was vital for game management.
What This Means Going Forward
Maresca will need to address these concerns sooner rather than later. While Palmer remains one of Chelsea’s most reliable attacking outlets, rotation and merit-based selections will be key to maintaining squad morale and performance levels.
If similar decisions continue, and players feel unfairly treated, Maresca could risk unrest within the squad—a situation no manager wants, especially in a highly competitive season.
As for Joe Cole’s comments, they serve as a reminder that legends of the game are watching closely, and fans will expect accountability for every decision made.
With crucial fixtures ahead, Maresca must ensure that his substitutions reflect what’s best for the team rather than individual preferences. Otherwise, more criticism from club icons like Joe Cole could follow, adding further scrutiny to his tenure at Chelsea.